Standard 2: Planning and Implementation
Education activities take into account international and national educational policies, laws, standards and plans and the learning needs of affected populations.
On this page
Formal and non-formal education programmes reflect international and national legal frameworks and policies
See Guidance Notes:
Planning and implementation of educational activities are integrated with other emergency response sectors
See Guidance Notes:
Emergency education programmes are linked to national education plans and strategies and are integrated into longer-term development of the education sector
Education authorities develop and implement national and local education plans that prepare for and respond to future and current emergencies
See Guidance Notes:
Formal and non-formal education programmes should provide inclusive educational activities that fulfill education rights and goals. They should be in line with national and international legal frameworks.
Education responses, including early childhood development and youth activities, should be linked to activities carried out in other sectors such as water supply, sanitation and hygiene promotion, nutrition, food security and food aid, shelter, health services and economic recovery.
National and local education plans should indicate the actions to be taken in current or future emergencies. They should specify decision-making, coordination, security and protection mechanisms for inter-sectoral coordination. Plans should be based on a thorough understanding of the context and should include indicators and mechanisms for early warning of disaster and conflict. They should be supported by appropriate education policy and frameworks. There should be a system for regular revision of national and local education plans.
National authorities, humanitarian agencies, donors, NGOs, communities and other stakeholders should work together to ensure adequate funding for emergency education provision. Resource coordination should be country-led and integrated with existing coordination mechanisms. Where contextually feasible, resource allocation should be balanced between:
- physical elements, such as additional classrooms, textbooks and teaching and learning materials;
- qualitative components, such as teacher and supervisory training courses, teaching and learning materials.
Resources should be allocated for systematised and centralised reporting of attacks on education and the collection, analysis and sharing of education data.
Relevant information on policy planning and implementation, including practices to prevent corruption (in both monetary and non-monetary forms), should be shared between central and local authorities, communities and other humanitarian stakeholders. Transparency is important for effective monitoring and accountability. There should be confidential and culturally appropriate systems for handling complaints of corruption. These include policies to encourage people to report corruption and to protect those who do so.
Indicators
INEE Domain | INEE Standard | Indicator/Program Requirements | Clarification | Numerator | Denominator | Target | Disaggregation | Source of Indicator | Source of Data | Available Tool | Crisis Phase | |
Education Policy | Law & Policy Formulation (EP Std 1) Education authorities prioritise continuity and recovery of quality education, including free and inclusive access to schooling. |
5.1 Degree of engagement in evidence-based policy advocacy | Where national policies are inadequate, organizations participate in or support evidence-based advocacy for improving national policies. | Scale 1-5 (1 = low, 5 = high) Level 1—Organization is not aware of national policy deficiencies and does not seek to improve national policy Level 3—Organization engages in policy advocacy but does not rely on evidence-based approaches Level 5—Organization understands national policy deficiencies, and either leads or contributes to coalition efforts to strengthen national policies using evidence-based approaches |
4+ | NA | New | Program documentation | Tool required | All stages | ||
Planning & Implementation (EP Std 2) Education activities take into account international and national educational policies, laws, standards and plans and the learning needs of affected populations. |
5.2 Degree of adherence to national and international policies and laws | Education activities hold to account international and national educational policies, laws, standards, plans, and the learning needs of affected populations. | Scale 1-5 (1 = low, 5 = high) Level 1—Organization does not factor in national or international standards in program design Level 3—Organization has understanding of national and international standards but does not meet these standards in program design, implementation, monitoring, or evaluation Level 5—Organization uses all relevant national and international standards as a minimum standard in program design, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation |
4+ | NA | New | Program documentation | Tool required | All stages | |||
5.3 Level of planning for future and current emergencies | Plans are up to date and address full cycle of EiE response, from preparedness through response and recovery. This could be broken into sub-indicators for each stage, if relevant. | Scale 1-5 (1 = low, 5 = high) Level 1—Organization does not have plans for responding to future emergencies Level 3—Organization has plans for responding to future emergencies, but plans are either out of date or lack sufficient detail Level 5—Organization has detailed plans, that are regularly updated to respond to forseeable emergencies, as well as contingency plans for responding to unforseeable emergencies |
4+ | NA | New | Program documentation | Tool required | All stages |